Privileging People over Process
Sunday, September 20, 2009
A few days ago I posted about how the church can often be its own worst enemy when it comes to the ordination process.Posts about ordination candidacy tend to generate a lot of response - both in terms of e-mails and reader comments. I've always seen that as an indication of the level of frustration people often experience in the process itself. Having received a call from God to enter ministry, it can be exasperating to navigate a bureaucratic maze that seems designed to frustrate more than facilitate.
As I wrote about in my last column, there is a momentum in the UMC at large to reform the structure of the ordination process. That's good news! Significant changes were made at the 2008 General Conference, and I expect there to be more in 2012.
But we need more than just structural reform. We need a reform of personal attitudes as well. I take up this subject in my current column, where I talk about the importance of personal concern and attention on the part of candidacy mentors, DCOMs, and BOMs. You could add to that list, of course, with seminary professors, pastors, district superintendents, and bishops.
I firmly believe that any complicated process is made easier with the right attitudes on the part of the people in authority. The church as a whole should be constantly aware of the vulnerable and often uncertain position that ordination candidates find themselves in. They need the love, care, and wisdom that mentor figures can provide. And with that, I think a lot of the deep frustration that they often experience can be avoided.
The trend in our culture is, on the whole, toward greater bureaucracy. As that happens, we tend to think processes can take over in systems where people used to be the integral parts. That may work for shopping online and self-check outs at the grocery store, but I don't think it will ever work in the body of Christ.
We are members, one of the other! And as we try to respond faithfully to the Holy Spirit's work in raising up shepherds, we need to make sure that we're personally involved to help, assist, and encourage.
Labels: Church Reform, Ordination, UMC

4 Comments:
One of the primary responsibilities of the D.S. according to the Discipline is to SUPPORT AND ENCOURAGE AND TO GIVE SPIRITUAL SUPPORT TO THE CLERGY AND CHURCHES. This is a welcome change from the authoritarian, "top down" approach to superintendency. Not every D.S. models this...but none the less it is the model we share. On the other hand, the clergy are to SERVE the church rather than to expect the church to serve them. This is sometimes a difficult balance to maintain...between healthy self-care and self-promotion. I believe the "golden rule" is an excellent ethic for the D.S. to follow as we deal with clergy and churches. While we may have to make some very difficult decisions and actions related to "effectiveness" yet our primary call as superintendents is to encourage...encourage...encourage!
Gary E. Holdeman, D.S., Oklahoma Conference
Gary -
That is a wonderfully helpful comment. May every D.S. have the same approach to their vital shepherding ministry! Thank you for sharing those thoughts.
Grace & peace,
Andrew
Andrew,
This is a good post. I'm in the middle of the provisional membership with a few thoughts on what's not working (and what's working- but those are few and far between)
1. I've worked with the BOM in 2 different conferences (commissioned in Missouri, now serve in Oklahoma). Both of these conferences have a very strong top-down attitude. Both of these conferences give the impression that they are doing ME a favor for letting me interview and go through this process. The truth of the matter is, the conference needs me, just as much as I need them. But because it is so top-down there is a certain level of intimidation that these BOMs perpetuate. I've been in conversation where the implied "son" is said on multiple occasions.
2. Because of the attitude problem, there is no consideration but rather disrespect for those going through the process. For instance, our written material that is due this year became available for download less than 1 month before it was due. I work in a big church already working 50+ hours a week, and now I only have a month to get all this done. Disrespect.
3. I have never been asked about my spirituality. I've never been asked how I am growing in the love of Christ. I have never been asked (by a DS, a Bishop, or a BOM) how God is moving in my life. If we are really concerned with performance in ministry, seems like we should start there.
Spencer
Spencer -
Thanks for sharing those thoughts. My hectic life has kept me away from my site more than usual the past few weeks.
I'm sorry your experience has been negative in the ways you describe. All I can offer is this: I don't think your frustrations - which are so similar to so many that I hear - are a product of the individuals involved (bishop, d.s., BOM members, etc.). I think it is rather the result of a very flawed system.
We can, at least, begin to change that by being intentional each of our own attitudes and actions when we find ourselves in the other position. I was blessed to have folks who did just that when I was in your position.
Grace & peace,
AT
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home